How Should You Respond to a Letter of Demand in Sri Lanka?

You have received a Letter of Demand.

You have read it carefully, gathered your documents and worked out what the other party is claiming.

Now comes the more difficult question:

Should you reply—and if so, what should you say?

There is no standard reply suitable for every Letter of Demand.

Sometimes the appropriate response is a denial.

Sometimes part of the claim should be accepted and part disputed.

Sometimes more information is needed.

Sometimes settlement may be sensible.

And sometimes the safest course is to obtain legal advice before making any substantive response.

The important thing is that your reply should reflect your actual factual and legal position.

1. Do You Have to Reply?

There is no simple rule that every Letter of Demand must receive a detailed written reply.

But deliberately ignoring one without considering the consequences can be unwise.

Depending on the circumstances, a failure to respond may later be considered together with the other evidence in a dispute.

However, silence does not automatically mean that everything stated in the Letter of Demand has been admitted.

The better question is therefore not simply:

“Must I reply?”

It is:

“Would replying—or not replying—help or harm my position in this particular dispute?”

2. Decide What Your Position Actually Is

Before writing anything, decide which of the following best describes your position.

You completely dispute the claim

You may deny that money is owed, dispute ownership, deny an alleged encroachment, reject an allegation that you breached an agreement, or deny some other essential part of the claim.

Where possible, identify the real reason for the dispute rather than simply saying:

“Everything is denied.”

You accept part but dispute the rest

Many disputes are not all-or-nothing.

You may accept that a transaction occurred but dispute the amount claimed.

You may accept that there is a boundary dispute but reject the boundary asserted by the other party.

You may accept the existence of an agreement but dispute that you breached it.

A response can distinguish clearly between what is accepted and what remains disputed.

You substantially accept the claim

Sometimes the claim is substantially correct and the real issue is how it can be resolved.

That may involve payment arrangements, additional time, completion of an obligation or another practical settlement.

Even then, understand the consequences before making formal admissions.

You need more information

Sometimes the Letter of Demand does not provide enough information to allow a proper response.

You may need an account breakdown, copies of documents, clarification of the land claimed, details of how an amount was calculated or the basis of an alleged right.

In such cases, requesting clarification may be more appropriate than immediately admitting or denying the claim.

3. Should You Reply Personally or Through an Attorney-at-Law?

For some simple matters, a person may respond directly.

But legal assistance becomes particularly useful where:

• land, ownership or possession is disputed;
• a substantial amount of money is involved;
• prescription may arise;
• a deed, agreement, cheque or guarantee is involved;
• litigation appears likely;
• the factual history is complicated; or
• the response may contain important admissions.

The value of an Attorney-at-Law at this stage is not simply making the reply sound formal.

It is identifying what should—and what should not—be said.

4. Do Not Automatically Deny Everything

A response does not become stronger merely because every allegation is denied.

If the parties clearly entered into an agreement, for example, it may be unnecessary to deny the agreement itself where the real dispute concerns its meaning or alleged breach.

Similarly, in a land dispute, both sides may agree about the identity of the property but disagree about ownership, possession or a boundary.

A useful response identifies the real point of disagreement.

5. Do Not Admit More Than You Intend To

The opposite mistake is replying too casually.

Statements such as:

“Yes, I owe the money, but I cannot pay now.”

or:

“I know the land belongs to you, but my family has occupied it for years.”

may have consequences beyond what the writer intended.

This is particularly important where prescription, ownership, possession or contractual obligations are disputed.

The safest principle is:

Do not make an important admission until you understand what you are admitting.

That does not mean making false denials.

It means stating your position accurately and deliberately.

6. If the Dispute Concerns Land or Property

First identify exactly what is disputed.

Is it:

• ownership;
• possession;
• a boundary;
• an encroachment;
• a right of way;
• occupation with permission;
• tenancy;
• inheritance; or
• some other interest?

These are different legal issues.

For example:

“I am the owner.”

“I am in possession.”

“I entered with permission.”

and

“The boundary shown by you is incorrect.”

are not saying the same thing.

Land disputes may require examination of deeds, survey plans, the history of possession and previous litigation.

For that reason, a quick reply based only on memory can sometimes create difficulties.

7. If the Dispute Concerns Money

Work out exactly what you dispute.

Is it:

• the existence of the debt;
• the amount;
• interest;
• the date payment became due;
• payments already made;
• the terms of the agreement; or
• liability itself?

If you accept that money is due but cannot pay immediately, negotiation may sometimes be more practical than litigation.

Possible solutions may include additional time, instalments or an agreed settlement.

But if the debt is disputed, or the transaction is old, obtain advice before casually acknowledging liability.

8. Do You Need to Explain Your Entire Case?

Usually not.

A reply to a Letter of Demand is not the same as presenting your entire case at trial.

Sometimes a detailed explanation is helpful.

Sometimes identifying the core dispute is enough.

A useful response should generally be:

• accurate;
• clear;
• relevant;
• consistent with the documents; and
• limited to what genuinely needs to be communicated.

A longer reply is not automatically a stronger reply.

9. Can You Ask for More Information?

Yes.

Where necessary, you may ask for clarification about matters such as:

• how an amount was calculated;
• payments said to remain outstanding;
• documents relied upon;
• the land or boundary being claimed;
• the basis of an alleged right;
• an agreement said to have been breached; or
• the loss for which compensation is claimed.

Requesting information does not necessarily amount to accepting the claim.

It may simply mean that you need further information before you can properly respond.

10. Can You Suggest a Settlement?

Yes.

A Letter of Demand does not inevitably have to lead to litigation.

Depending on the dispute, possible solutions may include:

• direct negotiation;
• correspondence through Attorneys-at-Law;
• an agreed payment arrangement;
• correction or clarification of documents;
• a survey or technical examination;
• mediation; or
• another negotiated settlement.

Settlement can be particularly useful where the parties must continue dealing with one another, such as neighbours, relatives, business partners, landlords and tenants, or parties to an ongoing commercial relationship.

A settlement proposal does not necessarily mean accepting every allegation made by the other party.

11. What About the Deadline in the Letter?

A Letter of Demand may say:

“Comply within seven days, failing which legal proceedings will be instituted.”

That period is not automatically equivalent to a deadline imposed by a court.

Nevertheless, deal with the matter promptly.

If you need time to check documents or obtain legal advice, do so without unnecessary delay.

12. What Happens After You Reply?

The sender may:

• accept your explanation;
• reject it;
• provide more information;
• make another proposal;
• begin settlement discussions;
• send further correspondence;
• take no further action; or
• institute legal proceedings.

A good response cannot guarantee that litigation will be avoided.

Its purpose is to communicate your position accurately and, where possible, create an opportunity to resolve the dispute.

13. If Court Documents Arrive Afterwards

This distinction is very important.

A Letter of Demand is correspondence from the other side.

A summons, plaint, petition or other document issued through a court is part of formal legal proceedings.

Do not treat court documents as simply another Letter of Demand.

Court proceedings involve procedural requirements and time limits.

Obtain legal advice promptly.

Before Sending Your Reply

Ask yourself:

Have I understood the claim correctly?

Do I know what I accept and what I dispute?

Am I accidentally admitting something important?

Am I denying something that is plainly true?

Do I need further information?

Could this dispute realistically be settled?

Should an Attorney-at-Law review the response before it is sent?

Those questions are more important than making the reply sound aggressive or technical.

Final Thought

The purpose of responding to a Letter of Demand is not to write the strongest-sounding letter.

It is to communicate your position carefully.

Sometimes that means denying a claim.

Sometimes it means correcting the facts.

Sometimes it means asking for further information.

And sometimes it means trying to resolve the dispute without going to court.

A good response is not necessarily the longest or most aggressive one. It is the one that accurately protects your position while keeping open the most appropriate way forward.

← Back to Contracts & Recovery  ·  All Legal Guides